|
Contents:
2.11 AUTHORIZATION AND MODIFICATION OF
CERTIFICATES
2.12 AUTHORIZATION AND MODIFICATION OF COURSES
2.21 MINIMUM FACULTY FOR AN ACADEMIC PROGRAM
2.23 LIMITED ACCESS PROGRAMS
2.31 HONORARY DEGREES
2.41 STUDENT GRIEVANCES
2.43 NON-ACADEMIC SUSPENSION
2.44 ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT
2.45 UNIVERSITY
JUDICIAL PROCEDURES
2.52 ACADEMIC SCHEDULE
2.53 SCHEDULING CLASSROOMS, TEACHING LABORATORIES,
AND CONFERENCE ROOMS
2.56 OBSERVANCE OF RELIGIOUS HOLY DAYS
2.59 ACADEMIC SPECIAL EVENTS
2.61 INSTRUCTOR CLASSROOM HOURS AND ABSENCES
2.62 INSTRUCTOR OFFICE HOURS
2.63 COURSE SYLLABI REQUIREMENTS
2.65 SPOUSES AND RELATIVES AS STUDENTS
Effective:
January 19, 2000
PURPOSE
To define the
criteria and process that governs the authorization
and modification of certificates.
AUTHORITY/SOURCE
University Curriculum
Committee
Provost and
Vice President for Academic Affairs
POLICY
Any certificate
offered under the auspices of the University must have
the prior approval of (a) the curriculum committees
and faculty bodies of the appropriate Colleges and/or
Schools of the University, (b) the University Curriculum
Committee of the Faculty Senate, and (c) the Vice President
for Academic Affairs. The deletion of an authorized
certificate program likewise requires the prior approval
of those same committees and offices.
Two types of
certificates are recognized:
Academic
Certificate - awarded by an academic unit to a student
at the time of the awarding of his/her Bachelors degree,
or upon completion of the appropriate coursework to
a student who already possesses a Bachelors degree.
An academic certificate is interdisciplinary in nature.
Professional
Certificate - awarded by an academic unit to an
individual who completes the appropriate coursework
in the area of concentration. Two distinctions are made
between the Professional Certificate and the Academic
Certificate:
1. The Professional
Certificate need not be interdisciplinary;
2. The Professional
Certificate need not be associated with a degree.
PROCEDURE
The approved
process and procedures for requesting authorization
for a certificate are given in the Policies and Procedures
Manual of the University Curriculum Committee.
2.12 AUTHORIZATION AND MODIFICATION OF COURSES
Effective:
January 19, 2000
PURPOSE
To define the
criteria and process that govern the initial authorization
and modification of an academic course.
AUTHORITY/SOURCE
University Curriculum
Committee
Vice President
for Academic Affairs
POLICY
Any new academic
courses offered under the auspices of the University
must have the prior approval of (a) Department Chair
and Dean, (b) the curriculum committees and the faculty
bodies of the appropriate Colleges and/or Schools of
the University, (c) the University Curriculum Committee
of the Faculty Senate, and (d) the Vice President for
Academic Affairs.
Any modification
of an approved course - course prefix, course number,
credit, prerequisite, title, catalog description, cross
listing, or complete deletion must have the prior approval
of the committees and office as noted above.
PROCEDURE
The approved
process and procedure for requesting authorization or
deletion of an academic course are given in the Policies
and Procedures Manual of the University Curriculum
Committee.

2.21 MINIMUM FACULTY FOR AN ACADEMIC PROGRAM
Effective:
January 19, 2000
PURPOSE
To specify the
minimum faculty necessary for academic programs.
AUTHORITY/SOURCE
Provost and
Vice President for Academic Affairs
Southern Association
of Colleges and Schools, Criteria 4.1.3; 4.4.2.3.
POLICY
For each undergraduate
curricula area in which a major in a degree program
is offered, a faculty member academically qualified
in the field must be assigned responsibility for course
or program oversight and coordination, as well as for
curriculum development and review. At least one full-time
faculty member with appropriate credentials, as defined
in the policy on "Instructor Qualifications and Documentation,"
must have primary teaching assignment in the curricular
area.
An effective
graduate program depends on the scholarly interaction
of faculty. The appropriate number of faculty members
to adequately support a program varies according to
the discipline and the scope of the program. For each
graduate degree program, there must be four qualified
full-time faculty members whose responsibilities include
teaching in the program.
PROCEDURE
Department Chairs
and Academic Deans must maintain this policy at all
times.
2.23 LIMITED ACCESS PROGRAMS
Effective: January
19, 2000
PURPOSE
To explain the
operation of limited access programs.
AUTHORITY/SOURCE
FAC 6C-6.001
POLICY
A limited access
program utilizes selective admission to limit program
enrollment. Limited access status is justified where
student demand exceeds available resources, such as
faculty, instructional facilities, equipment or specific
accrediting requirements. Criteria for selective admissions
include indicators of ability, performance, creativity
or talent to complete required work within the program.
Florida Community College transfer students with Associate
in Arts degrees are given equal consideration with FIU
students. Admissions to such programs are governed by
the Articulation Agreement and the State of Florida
Board of Regent rules.
PROCEDURE
There will be
a documented justification for the program to be classified
as limited access. This documentation must be submitted
to the Board for review and approval at least 6 months
prior to the start of the limited access program. The
criteria for assigning limited access status to an educational
program includes demand by qualified students in excess
of available resources (student-faculty ratios, instructional
facilities, equipment, or specific accrediting requirements),
standards of selectivity, and national or state needs
for graduates of the program. Annually, each university
will reevaluate the need to continue to classify the
program as limited access. The university will report
to the Board by October 1 of each year a list of limited
access programs, the minimum admissions standards for
each program, and a copy of the most recent review demonstrating
the need for retention of limited access status. This
annual report shall include for each limited access
program the following categories, by race and gender:
the number of applicants, the number of applicants granted
admission, the number of applicants who are granted
admission and enroll, the number of applicants denied
admission, and the number of applicants neither granted
admission nor denied admission. Each category shall
be reported by type of student, including the following
subcategories: native students (students who started
at the university as first-time-in-college students
with less than 12 semester hours of credit), community
college associate of arts degree transfer students,
and other students. Each category and subcategory shall
further be reported according to the number of students
who meet or exceed the minimum eligibility requirements
for admission to the program and the number of students
who do not meet or exceed the minimum eligibility requirements
for admission to the program. Programs assigned limited
access status will be reviewed by the Board in the course
of its five-year system-wide program review process.
All criteria
shall be approved by the Board and registered with the
Articulation Coordinating Committee prior to implementation.
Any criteria
used to select students shall not discriminate against
community college transfers with Associate in Arts degrees
from Florida public community colleges in favor of SUS
students who are applying for admission or plan to continue
enrollment after the completion of 60 semester credits
at the lower division level.
Any criteria
used to select students shall be appropriate indicators
of academic ability, creativity or talent to perform
required work within the program and of the potential
for success.
Any criteria
used shall be publicized in catalogs, counseling manuals,
and other appropriate publications in accordance with
FAC 6A-10.23(13), with sufficient time for prospective
students to adjust programs to meet criteria.
Where necessary
to achieve established equal access enrollment goals,
up to ten percent of the students may be admitted to
a limited access program with different criteria.
Each university
shall advise students who meet the minimum requirements
for admission to the upper division of a state university,
but are denied admission to limited access programs,
of the availability of similar programs at other State
University System institutions and the admissions requirements
of such programs.
Associate in
Arts degree graduates from Florida community colleges
and university students who have successfully completed
60 or more credit hours of course work and met the requirements
of Section 240.107, Florida Statutes, shall receive
priority over out-of-state students for admission to
limited access programs, teacher certification programs,
or major programs requiring an audition or portfolio.
The Board may
declare certain degree programs as limited access programs.
In the case of the programs for which prerequisites
are required for admission, the prerequisites by themselves
will not cause a program to be declared limited access.
That is, if all the applicants meeting the prerequisites
are admitted to the program, the program is not a limited
access program. Associate in Arts graduates from Florida
public community colleges and universities who have
not completed prerequisite courses for a given major
shall be admitted to a university in order to complete
those prerequisites, after which program admission can
be determined. University degree programs may be declared
as limited access programs for the following reasons:
1. The number
of students who have met all the requirements for admission
to the university and to the program is in excess of
the available resources (examples are: space, equipment
or other instructional facilities; student-faculty ratios;
fiscal or other resource limitations). In the case of
such programs, selection for admission shall be competitive.
The selection criteria shall be determined by the program,
recognizing that the standards applied to the criteria
may vary from term to term depending on the number of
student spaces available and the quality of the applicant
pool. The selection criteria shall be published in the
university catalog along with the standards used for
admissions decisions at the time the catalog is published.
2. The program
is of such a nature (normally in the fine or performing
arts) that applicants must demonstrate through an audition
or submission of a portfolio that they already have
the minimum skills necessary for them to benefit from
the program.
3. The program
is a teacher certification program covered by the provisions
of Section 240.529, Florida Statutes, and a passing
score at the 40th percentile or above on a nationally
standardized college entrance examination is a prerequisite
for admission.
4. The program
is one for which the grade point average required for
admission is above that required for admission to the
university offering the program.
5. When an institution
has exceeded its upper-level FTE enrollment limit as
assigned by the Legislature by more than five percent,
programs which have not normally been designated as
limited access programs may need to limit enrollment.
If the institution's actual student credit hour productivity
exceeds the institution's funded enrollment to this
extent, the institution may take corrective actions
in subsequent terms such as limiting admission of new
students into upper level programs, limiting course
loads of enrolled students and/or other measures as
may be necessary to stay within funded enrollment levels.
Florida community college Associate in Arts graduates
and university students who have successfully completed
60 credit hours of course work and met the requirements
of Section 240.017, Florida Statutes, shall receive
priority for admission to such limited access programs
over out-of-state and other transfer students.

2.31 HONORARY DEGREES
Effective: January
19, 2000
PURPOSE
To indicate
the criteria and process for selecting nominees for
honorary degrees awarded by the University.
AUTHORITY/SOURCE
Provost and
Vice President for Academic Affairs
President
Florida Board of Regents
POLICY
Nominations
for honorary degrees may be submitted by faculty, students,
staff or the Honorary Degree Committee.
Nominations
for honorary degrees must be approved by the Honorary
Degree Committee, the President, and the Florida Board
of Regents Executive Committee.
The qualifications
and conditions for recipients of honorary degrees are
as follows:
The person
should be fairly well known in his or her field of
endeavor - internationally, nationally or locally
- as evidenced by supportive documents.
Persons who
currently hold elective political office in the State
of Florida, or who are declared candidates for elective
political office in Florida, or who currently hold
faculty or administrative position at Florida International
University or in the State University System, are
not eligible for an honorary degree conferred by Florida
International University.
A nominee
for an honorary degree must receive a two-thirds affirmative
vote of a quorum of the Honorary Degree Committee.
PROCEDURE
When more than
one nominee is selected by the Honorary Degree Committee,
all names must be submitted as a group to the President.
2.41 UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT GRIEVANCES
Effective: January
19, 2000
PURPOSE
a) To allow
students to grieve against a faculty member or an administrator
when appropriate.
b) It is designed
as a university-wide policy to replace the various individual
unit policies and the "Student Grievance Procedure"
outlined in the Student Handbook. ( April 1, 1992).
AUTHORITY/SOURCE
Provost and
Vice President for Academic Affairs
Vice President for Student Affairs
POLICY
Students have
the right to bring grievances against a faculty member
or an administrator concerning academic matters. Such
matters may include but are not limited to: failure
to abide by the stated policies and procedures articulated
in a syllabus, unprofessional classroom practice, arbitrary
and capricious awarding of grades, failure to respect
a student's right to privacy, and discrimination based
on age, sex, religion, race, marital status, national
origin or disability. (The last category, discrimination,
will be handled by the EOP Office, following procedures
developed in compliance with the Florida Equity Act).
This document outlines the procedures by which student
grievances are to be handled.
Student Government
Council
The Student
Government Council has an Advisory Branch to counsel
and assist students in grievance procedure decisions.
Students may contact the SGC office for more information.
To achieve this
purpose, the student must adhere to the following guidelines:
1. The student
must exhaust remedies provided by the informal grievance
procedure described below.
2. The student
may then elect to use the formal grievance procedure
described below.
3. Formal grievances
may be deemed to be invalid or outside the jurisdiction
of the University Student Grievance Committee.
4. When the
complaint originates in a classroom setting between
an instructor and a student, the complaint must be filed
in a timely fashion; i.e., no later than 10 working
days into the semester following the semester in which
the complaint originated.
5. When the
complaint does not originate in a classroom setting,
the student must begin the grievance procedure in a
timely fashion but no later than 20 working days following
the incident.
PROCEDURE
Informal
Grievance Procedure
If a student
has a complaint against a faculty member, the student
should attempt to resolve the complaint by an informal
meeting with the faculty member involved. If the student
believes that he or she cannot discuss the complaint
with the instructor, the student should submit a written
letter of complaint specifying the details of the grievance
and the actions he or she is requesting to the chair
of the department within which the faculty member is
located. The student should file this complaint in as
timely a manner as possible, but in no case can the
complaint be filed later than the limits prescribed
above.
If the student
has an unresolved complaint against a chair, as an instructor
of record, the student should submit a written letter
to the dean of the school/college. The dean and/or the
dean's designee should meet with the student within
ten working days to discuss and attempt to resolve the
complaint. If the student has an unresolved complaint
against a dean or director as an instructor of record,
the written letter of complaint should be submitted
to the office of the Provost/Vice President of Academic
Affairs. Again, the student should file this complaint
in as timely a manner as possible, but in no case can
the complaint be filed later than ten working days after
the beginning of the semester (the first day of classes)
following the semester in which the incident occurred.
Upon receiving
a written letter of complaint, the chair of the department
or the dean/director or the Provost/Vice President for
Academic Affairs has ten working days to notify the
parties involved and to schedule a meeting. The student
may be accompanied by a counselor (parent, friend, attorney,
faculty member, etc.) if the student so wishes. A counselor
may consult with the student, but he or she may not
cross-examine those giving testimony or otherwise participate
in the meeting. The purpose of this meeting is to resolve
the student's complaint informally. The chair (or dean/director
or the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs)
will keep a written record of the meeting between the
parties and within five working days will inform each
in writing (by certified mail to the student) of the
understanding reached at the meeting. This written record
will be kept for a minimum of three years.
If after receiving
the written communication of the result of the informal
procedure the student is not satisfied, he or she may
ask for a formal resolution of his or her complaint
by filing a request with the office of the Provost/
Vice President for Academic Affairs for a hearing before
the University Student Grievance Committee. A petition
for a formal resolution must be filed no later than
ten working days from the date of the postmark of the
chair's (or dean's/director's or Provost/Vice President
for Academic Affairs) letter stating the outcome of
the informal resolution.
Formal Grievance
Procedure
A student may
not elect to use the formal grievance procedure until
the student has met with the faculty member, the chairperson,
or the dean/director of the school/college. The only
exception to this is when the student has submitted
his/her written complaint for informal resolution and
has received no response or action within the ten working
days established by this policy.
A student has
ten working days following his or her notification of
the conclusion of the informal resolution to request
a formal resolution. The request for a formal resolution,
detailing the specifics of the complaint and attaching
all previous correspondence generated during the informal
resolution process, must be sent to the office of the
Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs (form is
available from Provost/Vice President's office). The
student must secure the signature of the chair or dean,
on the petition for a formal hearing, to certify that
the informal process has been completed. Within ten
working days from receiving the complaint, the office
of the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs or
his or her designee shall submit the complaint to the
Chair of the University Student Grievance Committee
for review and consideration.
The Chair of
the University Student Grievance Committee may request
a Committee ruling on the validity of a student grievance
or whether the Committee has jurisdiction. The Committee
may rule that a formal hearing is unwarranted. Should
the committee determine that a hearing is unwarranted,
the student will be notified in writing within ten working
days of the Committee's decision. The decision of the
Committee regarding the validity of the complaint is
final.
If a formal
hearing is to be held, it will generally be heard at
the next meeting of the Committee. The Chair of the
University Student Grievance Committee will inform the
faculty member or the dean or the director and the student
(by certified mail to the student) of the date on which
the case will be heard. The student and the faculty
member, chair or dean have the right to be physically
present and be accompanied by a counselor. Such a counselor
may consult with the student or the faculty member but
cannot examine or cross-examine those giving testimony
or otherwise participate in the hearing. It will be
the Chair's decision as to whether or not attendance
of either party is mandatory. At the Chair's discretion,
either party can present his or her case in writing.
All relevant documents should be in the hands of the
Committee Chair no later than five working days before
the Committee meets to take up the case. Any documents
received after this date may be included at the discretion
of the Chair of the Committee.
After hearing
the case, the Committee will meet and make a recommendation
which will be forwarded to the office of the Provost/Vice
President for Academic Affairs. Within ten working days,
the office of the Provost/Vice President for Academic
Affairs will communicate the Committee's recommendation
to all parties (by certified mail to the student.)
Structure
of the University Student Grievance Committee
Membership
The University
Student Grievance Committee consists of five members:
three faculty members, including a non-voting Chair,
and two students. Membership for individual hearings
throughout the year may rotate among nominated faculty
and/or students.
At its first
meeting in the Fall Semester, the Faculty Senate shall
appoint a pool of at least seven faculty members, to
serve on the University Student Grievance Committee
for the academic year (including the Summer term). One
of these faculty members appointed by the Faculty Senate
shall serve as the non-voting Chair of the University
Student Grievance Committee. The selection of the Chair
will be made by the Chairperson of the Faculty Senate
in consultation with the Provost's office. From this
faculty pool, three will be contacted for serving on
each committee hearing. In the event that these appointed
faculty members are not available, the Chair of the
Faculty Senate shall appoint faculty members to fill
the vacant positions on the Committee.
The President
of the Student Government Council (SGC) shall furnish
the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs the
names of at least seven students who will serve on the
University Student Grievance Committee for the academic
year (including the Summer term). In the event that
these students are not available, the President of SGC
shall appoint students to fill the vacant positions
on the Committee.
The decisions
of the University Student Grievance Committee are based
on a majority vote. The Chair of the Committee will
vote only in case of a tie.
Schedule
of Meetings
It will be the
responsibility of the Chair of the University Student
Grievance Committee to schedule meetings as needed during
each semester.
Challenges
The student(s),
faculty member, chair or dean involved in the grievance
have the right to challenge the impartiality of any
panel member and to request of the Chair that member's
exclusion from participation, stating in writing to
the Chair the reasons for the request. A challenge may
be exercised no more than twice. Upon receiving such
a challenge, the Chair is obliged to require that the
participating member withdraw. Also, a member of the
Committee is obliged to withdraw from participating
on the Committee when he or she doubts his or her ability
to be impartial and to decide the matter according to
the evidence presented. In the event a member of the
Committee withdraws, the Chair shall select another
member to sit as a replacement.
Hearing
Procedures
The hearing
will be conducted under the provisions of the Florida
Sunshine Law, and a tape recording will be made of all
hearings. The Chair will call the hearing to order and
identify all those present:
1. The student
will present his or her complaint (including the calling
of witnesses if necessary) and a statement of action
being requested.
2. The faculty
member, chair or dean will respond (including the calling
of witnesses if necessary).
3. The Committee
members may cross-examine any of the parties involved.
4. The student
summarizes his or her case.
5. The faculty
member, chair or dean summarizes his or her case.
6. The Committee
reviews the case in executive session and makes its
recommendations for appropriate action to the Provost/Vice
President for Academic Affairs.
7. Within five
working days, the Chair of the Committee communicates
its recommendations to the office of the Provost/Vice
President for Academic Affairs.
8. The Chair
will be responsible for keeping records of the Committee's
deliberations and complying with all laws regarding
the confidentiality of University records.
Within ten working
days, the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs
or his or her designee communicates the Committee's
recommendation to all parties (by certified mail to
the student).
Access
to Information
Faculty and
administrators should comply with all reasonable and
legal requests for relevant information that will assist
the student in presenting his or her case and the Committee
in reaching a recommendation.
Right
of Appeal
If any of the
above outlined policies and procedures is violated,
any of the parties involved has the right to appeal
to the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs.
Any appeal must be made within ten working days from
the date the Committee's decision is received by the
student, faculty member, chair or dean. The Provost/Vice
President for Academic Affairs shall evaluate the complaint
and render a decision and a course of action on behalf
of the student no later than ten working days from the
receipt of the complaint. In these matters, the decision
of the Provost/Vice President is final.

2.43 NON-ACADEMIC SUSPENSION
Effective:
January 19, 2000
PURPOSE
To provide a
process whereby the University can suspend a student
for Non-Academic Misconduct, giving the student due
process.
AUTHORITY/SOURCE
FAC 6C8-3.014
POLICY
A student may
be suspended from the University for non-academic reasons
when it is determined by the Vice President for Student
Affairs that his or her continued presence would pose
a threat to the health and/or safety of another member
of the University community, provided that the student's
due process rights shall be observed.
A student will
be suspended for non-academic reasons when he or she
has been convicted of possession of any drug under Chapter
893 of the Florida Statutes.
Effective: January
19, 2000
PURPOSE
To provide a
process where the University can expel or suspend a
student for Academic Misconduct and the student can
appeal the decision.
AUTHORITY/SOURCE
Provost and
Vice President for Academic Affairs
POLICY
Students at
Florida International University are expected to adhere
to the highest standards of integrity in every aspect
of their lives. Honesty in academic matters is part
of this obligation.
Academic
integrity is the adherence to those special values regarding
life and work in an academic community. Any act or omission
by a student which violates this concept of academic
integrity shall be defined as academic misconduct and
shall be subject to the procedures and penalties set
forth herein.
Definition
of Academic Misconduct: The term "academic
misconduct" is academic dishonesty and shall include
the following acts and/or omissions:
a. Cheating,
which is the unauthorized use of books, notes, aids
or assistance from another person with respect to
examinations, course assignments, field service
reports, class recitations, or possession of examination
papers or course materials, whether originally authorized
or not. Any student helping another cheat may be
found guilty of academic misconduct.
b. Plagiarism,
consisting of the deliberate use and appropriation
of another’s work without any indication of the
source and the passing off of such work as the student’s
own. Any student who fails to give credit for ideas
or materials taken from another is guilty of plagiarism.
c. Misrepresentation
by lying to a member of the faculty, staff or administration
to increase one's grade.
d. Misuse
of computer services by the unauthorized use of
any computer or computer project number or alteration
or destruction of computerized information or files
or unauthorized appropriation of another's program(s).
e. Bribery
by offering money or any item or service to a member
of the faculty, staff or administration to gain
academic advantage for one's self or another.
Conspiracy
by planning or acting with one or more fellow students,
any member of the faculty, staff or administration
or any other person to commit any form of academic
misconduct together.
g. Falsification
of records, tampering with or altering in any way
any academic record used or maintained by the University.
h. Academic
dishonesty in general by any act or omission not
specifically mentioned above and which is outside
the customary scope of preparing and completing
academic assignments and/or contrary to the above
stated policies concerning academic integrity. Any
violation of this section shall require first a
determination as to whether the act or omission
constitutes academic misconduct.
PROCEDURE
All matters
relating to academic misconduct are referred to the
Office of the Provost for Academic Affairs. Acts of
academic misconduct may be alleged by faculty, staff
or students. Two actions that may be taken are:
Expulsion:
Permanent separation of the student from the University,
preventing readmission to the institution. This sanction
shall be recorded on the student's transcript.
Suspension:
Temporary separation of the student from the University
for a specific period of time.

2.45 UNIVERSITY JUDICIAL PROCEDURES
Effective: January
19, 2000
PURPOSE
To establish
procedures for the resolution of matters within the
University judicial system.
AUTHORITY/SOURCE
Vice President
of Student Affairs
Office of Judicial Affairs
POLICY
When an alleged
violation of the Student Code of Conduct occurs, it
shall be referred to the Office of Judicial Affairs.
Referrals may be made by faculty, staff or students.
PROCEDURE
2.52 ACADEMIC SCHEDULE
Effective:
January 19, 2000
PURPOSE
To outline the
Policies and Procedures for developing the schedule
for each academic semester.
AUTHORITY/SOURCE
Provost and
Vice President for Academic Affairs
University Registrar
POLICY
Only courses
fully approved by the University Curriculum Committee,
the Faculty Senate, and Vice President for Academic
Affairs may be scheduled.
Each department
must prepare the schedules of course offerings for future
semesters by the published dates. The respective deans,
in consultation with the Registrar must approve the
course schedules submitted by department.
PROCEDURE
The department
prepares its course schedule by first inputing future
term courses electronically to the Registrar.
Proofs of the schedule are sent back to Deans for final
review and modification.
The dean reviews
the schedule within the context of the enrollment management
plan, then signs and submits the Course Offerings form
to the Registrar by the published date.
Any subsequent
schedule changes are made on the Course Offerings form
in consultation with the Registrar and approved by the
appropriate dean.
The Registrar
reviews the Course Offerings form for accuracy and submits
a final copy to the department for review, prior to
printing and distribution.

2.53 SCHEDULING CLASSROOMS, TEACHING
LABORATORIES, AND CONFERENCE ROOMS
Effective:
January 19, 2000
PURPOSE
To state the
policies and procedures governing the scheduling of
classrooms, teaching laboratories and conference rooms.
AUTHORITY/SOURCE
Provost and
Vice President for Academic Affairs
Council of Deans
POLICY
The University
Registrar has the overall authority and responsibility
for scheduling all courses within existing classrooms.
All teaching laboratories and dedicated classrooms are
assigned to specific academic units for scheduling,
overall supervision, and responsibility for equipment.
This does not imply exclusive scheduling control or
implicit authority for renovation. Conference rooms
assigned to specific administrative/academic units may
be scheduled for courses starting at 5:00 PM by the
Registrar if needed.
All changes
(additions and/or cancellations) in classroom assignments
should be routed through the Office of the Registrar.
PROCEDURE
The Office of
Institutional Research allocates to the Deans classrooms
to be scheduled during specific time blocks.
Deans are responsible for the submission of their initial
schedule of classes for each semester by a specified
deadline. Specific physical requirements for a
class should be indicated at the time course offerings
are submitted. All changes must be submitted in
writing on the appropriate forms to the Registrar's
Office. Prior to the start of registration, the
Registrar's Office will assign classrooms to all courses.
For high demand
class times, each Academic Dean is given a limit on
the number of courses that School/College can offer
at peak meeting times. Each Academic Dean must
submit a priority list of all the courses of the high
demand meeting time so that the total requirement does
not exceed their allocation of rooms. If an Academic
Dean offers more courses during the high demand meeting
times than their assigned limit, then some of the low
priority courses may have to be rescheduled on alternate
days or times.
The academic
departments must submit to the Registrar's Office a
list of all their courses with specific room assignments
that will meet in their laboratories and/or dedicated
classrooms. Also, all Academic Deans must submit to
the Registrar's Office a list of all their courses that
are being taught in Davie and the Broward Tower with
specific room assignments. The Registrar's Office will
input this information so that the student's course
schedule will indicate where the courses meet. All course
cancellations, changes and additions must be done with
the appropriate form and must have the Academic Dean's
signature. Academic units may not add a course to their
schedule after the initial course submission, until
they verify with the Registrar's Office that a classroom
is available.
2.56 OBSERVANCE OF RELIGIOUS HOLY DAYS
Effective: January
19, 2000
PURPOSE
To state the policy on observance of religious holy
days in accordance with the minimum requirements of
the Board of Regents.
AUTHORITY/SOURCE
Florida Administrative Code 6C-6.0115
Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs
POLICY
Students who are absent from academic or social activities
because of religious observances will not be penalized.
A student who desires to be excused from class to observe
a religious holy day of his or her religious faith should
notify all of his or her instructors at least two weeks
in advance.
The student
is responsible for any material covered during the excused
absence, but will be permitted a reasonable amount of
time to make up any work missed. Examinations, major
assignments, and university ceremonies will not be scheduled
on a major religious holy day. If an examination was
administered during the class at which a student is
excused for a religious observance, the student should
make arrangements with the instructor to be examined
at an alternate time or be given a comparable assignment.
PROCEDURE
Major religious holy days are published every semester
in the Florida International University class schedule,
and in the University Calendar published annually in
the Undergraduate and Graduate catalogs.
This policy
and related procedures will be included in the Student
Handbook, Undergraduate Catalog, Faculty Handbook, and
Graduate Catalog.
Students who
believe they have been denied educational benefits because
of their religious beliefs or practices should seek
redress through the "Student Grievance Procedure".

2.59 ACADEMIC SPECIAL
EVENTS
Effective February
10, 2004
PURPOSE
To define the procedure for informing the University of proposed
Academic Special Events
AUTHORITY/SOURCE
Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs
Due Diligence Guide for Special Event Planning, Environmental
Health & Safety department
DEFINITIONS
A Special Event is defined by the University as “…a
short-term event that is not part of University’s daily/routine
operations.”
An Academic
Special Event is defined as a short-term event of an
academic nature that is not part of the University’s
daily/routine operations.
POLICY
Faculty who are planning an Academic Special Event,
as specified below, which requires University facilities
and personnel, beyond the normal requirements of regularly
scheduled class meetings, must ensure that the University
is properly and timely notified, in order that the University
has sufficient time to effectively prepare for the Special
Event.
For the purposes
of this policy, Academic Special Events, which must
be reported, are specified as follows:
Any Academic
Special Event in which the theme, subject matter, participants,
attendees, sponsors, or any other associated party might
reasonably be determined to be potentially disruptive
in any manner; to pose a health or safety hazard to
any member of the University Community; or to incur
liability for the University.
PROCEDURE
1. Academic Special Events, as specified above must
be reported to the dean’s office (or where applicable to the provost’s) 30 days prior to the event.
2. The Office
of Academic Affairs must be notified, via submission
of the Academic Special Event Notification form, not
less than two weeks prior to the Academic Special Event.
3. Any Academic
Special Event proposed to be scheduled less than two
weeks in advance of the date must be approved by the
Provost or designee prior to implementation.
4. The department
responsible for providing the venue (such as Facilities
Management, or the Graham Center, for the Academic Special
Event will follow the procedures and guidelines found
in the “Due Diligence Guide to Special Event Planning.”
5. The academic
unit hosting the Academic Special Event shall be financially
responsible for all services required to ensure the
safety and order of that event.
2.61 INSTRUCTOR CLASSROOM HOURS AND
ABSENCES
Effective: January
19, 2000
PURPOSE
To establish guidelines for instructor classroom hours
and absences.
AUTHORITY/SOURCE
Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs
Academic Deans
POLICY
It is the University's expectation that an instructor
conduct every scheduled class for the entire scheduled
time.
PROCEDURE
An instructor who anticipates being absent should notify
the department chair or academic dean as soon as possible
in order that arrangements may be made for the meeting
of classes and the performance of other scheduled duties.
Where possible, students should be notified in advance
of class cancellations.
When a personal
or professional obligation (e.g. professional conference,
etc.) requires that an instructor miss a class, the
instructor should receive the department chairperson's
approval in advance.
Instructors
must never hire anyone else to teach a course to which
they have been assigned.
Instructors
should make it normal practice to meet classes for the
full scheduled class time.
It is the responsibility
of the department chairperson to insure that this policy
is observed.
2.62 INSTRUCTOR OFFICE HOURS
Effective: January
19, 2000
PURPOSE
To insure that course instructors (including faculty,
adjuncts and graduate teaching assistants) are available
to meet with students outside of class.
AUTHORITY/SOURCE
Florida Administrative Code 6C2-4.029:2
POLICY
Each instructor must schedule office hours when they
will be available to confer with students. Office hours
must be scheduled so that students will have reasonable
access to their instructors. It is expected
that instructors will be available to students consistent
with scheduled contract periods.
PROCEDURE
Instructors must notify students of their office phone
number and hours and ensure that schedules of office
hours are posted near their office locations and in
their departments at the campuses where the course is
taught. Instructor office hours must be included in
the course syllabus.
Instructors
must afford students unable to meet during scheduled
office hours the opportunity to schedule special appointments.
They should urge communication through email and web
based communication systems.
Each academic
unit must establish a policy which specifies office
hours appropriate to the college/school or department.
Each academic unit should make every effort to provide
a place for everyone teaching to meet with students
(e.g. offices, conference rooms, etc.) It is the responsibility
of the department chairpersons to insure that these
policies are observed.

2.63 COURSE SYLLABI REQUIREMENTS
Effective: November
10, 2003
PURPOSE
To provide uniform expectations regarding the content of all course
syllabi produced at the University
AUTHORITY/SOURCE
Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs
PROCEDURE
1) All instructors of record are required to provide
students with a printed or published on line syllabus
for any course in which students receive academic credit
and for non credit courses required for a degree or
academic certificate.
2) Students
should receive or have access to the course syllabus
no later than the first class meeting for lecture and
lab courses, not later than the first day of the semester
for on line courses, and not later than the end of the
first week of the semester for internships, practicum,
independent studies, readings, or any other courses.
Exceptions to the time constraints of this policy may
be made on a case by case basis by department chairpersons
or school directors when instructors are assigned in
an untimely manner.
3) Each department
or school will maintain a file of current course syllabi
either on line or in printed copy throughout the semester,
which will be available for public examination.
Each course
syllabus must contain the following information:
a) The name
of the course, course and section numbers, course
description, course objectives and learning outcomes,
prerequisites
and corequisites (if any), and semester and year
offered;
b) The instructor's name, telephone number, e mail
address, department
or school, office location and office hours;
c) Required purchases including texts, lab supplies,
artistic supplies,
professional and ancillary items;
d) A tentative outline that includes major topics,
anticipated dates of
assignments, performances, artistic submissions,
and/or examinations;
e) Performance measures that will be considered
for evaluation in
awarding final grades;
f) Any policies of the instructor and/or department
that may impact a
student's enrollment or final grade;
g) Grading standards to be used in calculating final
grades;
h) Attendance standards, if required.
Instructors
are encouraged to include the following in course syllabi:
a) The University
drop date;
b) Instructor's policy on make up examinations,
assignments or
performance measures;
c) Recommended purchases including supplemental
texts, lab supplies,
artistic supplies, professional and ancillary items;
d) The University's Code of Academic Integrity;
e) Reference to University policies on academic
misconduct, sexual
harassment, and religious holidays, and information
on services for
students with disabilities.
Instructors
retain the right to modify the course syllabus for any
reason throughout the semester provided that:
a) Fair
and adequate notice is given to enrolled students
either by
e mail, in writing, or through online publishing;
b) Modifications to the syllabus are not arbitrary
or capricious, and;
c) Students are not unfairly disadvantaged by mid
semester changes to
grading standards, attendance standards, or performance
measures.

2.65 SPOUSES AND RELATIVES AS STUDENTS
Effective: January
19, 2000
PURPOSE
To avoid conflicts regarding students who are related
to the teacher or a faculty member in the same department.
POLICY
To avoid any potential conflict of interest, faculty
are encouraged to avoid instances where their students
are family members by directing those students to equivalent
courses taught by colleagues. Faculty are to
inform their Chairperson/Dean when conflict exists.
In those cases where coursework is not available from
any other professor, faculty are encouraged to follow
the following guidelines in order to ensure objectivity
in teaching and grading:
Another faculty
member should be responsible for grading class written
products when possible; class assignments should be
consistent for all students in the class; student tests
should be graded by another member of the faculty when
possible; faculty member should not be the student advisor
nor a member nor chair of the program of studies, thesis
or dissertation committee.
Last
update
January 24, 2008 2:37 PM
|